Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lighthaven"

From TitanWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Catagories!)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
::no problem, just didn't wanna revert without asking, I thought there might be a specific reason. sorry if I sounded bitchy, re-reading that it even comes off that way to me, lol... oh well, I'll blame fatigue? *sheepish grin* [[User:Azrael|Azrael]] 00:05, 14 May 2006 (EDT)
 
::no problem, just didn't wanna revert without asking, I thought there might be a specific reason. sorry if I sounded bitchy, re-reading that it even comes off that way to me, lol... oh well, I'll blame fatigue? *sheepish grin* [[User:Azrael|Azrael]] 00:05, 14 May 2006 (EDT)
 
:::Now that I think about it, actually, each article only needs to have context within itself. Technically, it would be perfectly fine to refer to ''both'' the "Order of Service" and the "Order of the Shining Star" as "the Order" in their own articles. we only need to differentiate when both Orders could be under discussion in the same context. Just a little trick of English grammar. ;) [[User:Curulan|Curulan]] 13:57, 14 May 2006 (EDT)
 
:::Now that I think about it, actually, each article only needs to have context within itself. Technically, it would be perfectly fine to refer to ''both'' the "Order of Service" and the "Order of the Shining Star" as "the Order" in their own articles. we only need to differentiate when both Orders could be under discussion in the same context. Just a little trick of English grammar. ;) [[User:Curulan|Curulan]] 13:57, 14 May 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Catagories! ==
 +
 +
Solution to all of our problems.  I have no idea how to add them and then to sort the articles into catagories though...
 +
 +
T

Revision as of 17:25, 14 May 2006

Curu, "Order" is too non-specific, the term is the most common designation for a knightly/fraternal organization and just within Titan there is another Order of some significance (Revchass's Order of Service). What's your reasoning that "OSS" is insufficient? If anything I think linking OSS might be a good idea, as it's a common term. It would, of course, redirect to Order of the Shining Star.

And what in the sam hell is a "chafe"? =P

Az

I see your point. OSS would be fine with me, then; feel free to revert it. I've always called it the "Order" when using shorthand. Curulan 21:54, 12 May 2006 (EDT)
no problem, just didn't wanna revert without asking, I thought there might be a specific reason. sorry if I sounded bitchy, re-reading that it even comes off that way to me, lol... oh well, I'll blame fatigue? *sheepish grin* Azrael 00:05, 14 May 2006 (EDT)
Now that I think about it, actually, each article only needs to have context within itself. Technically, it would be perfectly fine to refer to both the "Order of Service" and the "Order of the Shining Star" as "the Order" in their own articles. we only need to differentiate when both Orders could be under discussion in the same context. Just a little trick of English grammar. ;) Curulan 13:57, 14 May 2006 (EDT)

Catagories!

Solution to all of our problems. I have no idea how to add them and then to sort the articles into catagories though...

T